Saturday, 24 December 2016
Saturday, 10 December 2016
Do we have this fallacy in our thinking that an expert in one thing can be an expert in everything? Is that why we made a scientist our President, a former academician our Vice President, former RBI Governor & Finance Minister our Prime Minister, former heroine a Chief Minister, and literature, sports, & film personalities (mostly former) elected/nominated as members of Parliament?
Mark-getting (Marketing), Sadistic (Sad about Statistics), Achaar (HR-Human Resource), Maniacs (Management Accounts), Fanatics (Financial Accounts), Biogas (Behaviour in Organistion-OB)... etc are certain 'subject'ive redefinitions that I recently overheard from the corridors of a management institute.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
A menu for digital diet: During the pandemic, one behaviour that slunk quietly into our lives is our digital addiction. Confined ind...
-
Day 4: Text without a context is a pretext यावत् स्थास्यन्ति गिरयः सरितश्च महीतले। तावत् रामायणकथा लोकेषु प्रचरिष्यति ।। .... means’...
-
One is a victim of one's programming (especially by the religion one is born in), and thereafter refuses to see or seek the truth...
-
Public views about the recent currency demonetisation are like the parable of 6 blind men trying to define the features of an elephant. ...